home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu.tar
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
icon
/
newsgrp
/
group01a.txt
/
000043_icon-group-sender _Wed May 31 08:37:32 2000.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2002-01-03
|
1KB
Return-Path: <icon-group-sender>
Received: (from root@localhost)
by baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id IAA17431
for icon-group-addresses; Wed, 31 May 2000 08:37:07 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <200005311537.IAA17431@baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU>
From: "Jim Mehl" <mehl@ihot.com>
To: "icon-group" <icon-group@optima.CS.Arizona.EDU>
Subject: Re: coexpression history
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 19:45:05 -0700
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Errors-To: icon-group-errors@optima.CS.Arizona.EDU
Status: RO
Content-Length: 386
I don't think so. I have this vague remembrance that
coexpression/coroutine was actually proposed many years
ago in the context of a COBOL compiler of all things.
Maybe someone with a better sense of computer science
history can help me out here.
Jim Mehl
> Did the word 'coexpression' or the associated idea originate with icon?
> Or is it a high school computer science thing?